Legal Opinion
State v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
California Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1951No. S. F. 18003PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The State of California brought this action for declaratory relief to determine the validity of a contract entered into by respondent brotherhoods and the Board of *414State Harbor Commissioners respecting the rates of pay and working conditions of employees of the State Belt Railroad. This appeal was taken from a judgment in favor of respondents declaring the contract valid.
The Belt Railroad is owned and operated by the state, and its management and control are committed by statute to the Board of State Harbor Commissioners. (Harb. & Nav. Code, §§ 3150-3165.) The railroad parallels the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- California v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State Board of Education v. LevitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.