Legal Opinion
Scherer v. LABORERS'INTERN. UNION OF N. AMERICA
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided December 19, 1988No. 87-30267-RVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
Pending are cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment on Counts II and III of the amended complaint. (Doc. 46) Defendant Laborers’ International Union of North America has moved for summary judgment on Counts I and II. (Docs. 26, 55) For the reasons set out below, I find that the plaintiff’s motion must be DENIED. The defendant’s motion must be DENIED on Count I, but GRANTED on Count II.
A motion for summary judgment should be granted when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and ad missions on file,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- United States v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Coleman v. Alcolac, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.