Legal Opinion
E.T. Ex Rel. Dougherty v. George
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 7, 2010No. 2:09-cv-01950 FCD DADPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants Ronald M. George, William C. Vickrey, and James M. Mize’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to abstain and to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs E.T., K.R., C.B., and G.S., by their next friend, Frank Dougherty, (collectively “plaintiffs”) oppose the motions. On November 6, 2009, the court heard oral argument on defendants’ arguments relating to justiciability. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of plaintiffs’ allegations…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Connor B. Ex Rel. Vigurs v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- E.T. ex rel. E.T. v. Cantil-SakauyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Tinsley v. McKayDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Attala County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Beck v. Superior Court of California, County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.