E.T. ex rel. E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has decided to amend the opinion filed September 13, 2011. The opinion is withdrawn and a substituted opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is rejected. No further petitions for…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Courthouse News Service v. New Mexico Administrative Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Brenda Miles v. David WesleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.