Legal Opinion

Zuppo v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 4, 2002No. 208,2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In February 2002, a Superior Court jury convicted Appellant Anthony Zuppo of Second Degree Assault, Offensive Touching, Second Degree Rape, Third Degree Assault, Harassment, five counts of NonCompliance with Bond Conditions, and three counts of Aggravated Act of Intimidation. At trial, Zuppo requested to proceed pro se. Because Zuppo’s request came during trial, the judge denied it on the basis that to do so would disrupt the proceedings. Zuppo appeals from that decision.

We conclude that based upon the series of events leading up to Zuppo’s request, Zuppo’s interest failed to outweigh- the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Leroy Buhl v. Mr. Cooksey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Michael T. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Christopher v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. Zuppo v. CarrollDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  5. ZUPPO v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API