Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 10, 2012No. 35, 2012DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-Below/Appellant, Maurice Williams (“Williams”), appeals his Superior Court conviction for Escape After Conviction.

Williams raises two claims on appeal. Williams contends the trial judge abused her discretion when 1) she refused to allow him to proceed pro se during his trial and 2) she denied his request for the jury to consider a defense of justification. Because Williams’ request to represent himself was denied without a colloquy and the required legal analysis, we are compelled to reverse.1

Facts and Procedural History

On November 4, 2010, Williams was serving a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. Ronnie PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Michael T. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. Fry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026
  4. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API