Legal Opinion

Zuppo v. Carroll

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 23, 2006No. CIV. 05-504-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner Anthony Zuppo (“petitioner”) is an inmate in custody at the Delaware Correctional Institution in Smyrna, Delaware. Before the court is petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (D.I.2) The State has filed its answer that habeas relief is not warranted. For the reasons that follow, petitioner’s application will be denied.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts of petitioner’s case are as follows:

In September 2000, Wendy Reynolds and [petitioner] began dating and they moved…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. EmigDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  2. State v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API