L.E. Smith Glass Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
We granted allocatur in this case to discuss whether a workers’ compensation claimant can collect concurrent total disability awards for two separate injuries when each injury is totally disabling and, if so, the proper method of apportioning those awards. The Commonwealth Court determined that Milton Clawson (Clawson), the claimant in the present case, was entitled to concurrent total disability awards up to the statutory maximum for the year of the second injury; for the reasons discussed herein, we reverse the Order of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- South Abington Township v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kane v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.