Gray v. McLaughlin
Indiana Supreme Court
From Tippecanoe Superior Court; Charles W. Hanley, Judge Pro Tent. Proceedings by John McLaughlin and others, opposed by Martin P, Gray and others, for the repair and improvement of a public drain. From a judgment establishing the drain, the opponents appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, C. J.
This is a proceeding brought under §19 of the Drainage Act of March 11,1907, as amended by Acts 1913 p. 152, §6174 Burns 1914, to repair and improve a public drain. The trial court established the drain, and this is an appeal from that judgment.
There are about 390 appellants who joined in the assignment of error. Appellees call our attention to the fact that at least 308' of them are not parties to the judgment.
Appellants set out in their brief fourteen assignments of error. In their motion for a new trial they assign thirty-six reasons why a new trial should be granted.
1. Under “Points and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Malott v. Central Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Leach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. MonfortIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. SniderIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Dampier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Ex Parte McAdams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.