Legal Opinion

Eckart v. Fort Wayne & Northern Indiana Traction Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1914No. 22,227PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Prom Allen Circuit Court; Edward 0 ’Rourke, Judge. Condemnation proceedings by the Port Wayne and Northern Indiana Traction Company against Anna Echart and others. Prom an interlocutory judgment adjudging that plaintiff was entitled to appropriate the land, and appointing appraisers to assess the damages, this appeal is prosecuted.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

This was an action by appellee, a street railway company, engaged in operating a system of street and interurban railroads, against appellants, to appropriate, for terminal purposes, etc., a tract of appellant Anna Eckart’s land, in the city of Fort Wayne. Errors are here assigned by appellant Anna Eekart only, and, for convenience, she will be designated as “appellant” in this opinion. To appellee’s complaint filed under the provisions of the eminent domain act of 1905 (Acts 1905 p. 59, §929, et seq. Burns 1908), appellant filed seventeen written objections. The trial court sustained a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bartholomew v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Richland School Township v. OvermyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Walker v. TowleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ridgway v. Yenny Ridgway v. LombardoIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Salk v. WeinraubIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. DAHL ET UX. v. Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Indianapolis Water Co. v. LuxIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Meyer v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API