Legal Opinion

Floerchinger v. Sioux Falls Gas Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1942No. File No. 8467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling motion to quash the service of summons on the ground that defendant corporation had been dissolved and its existence terminated under the laws of the state of its creation. Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. Summons and complaint were served on December 31, 1940, upon the Secretary of State as the appointed agent of the defendant for service of process. The showing made in support of the motion is that the defendant, a corporation organized under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Hoyt v. . Thompson'sNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Demarest v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. M.S. v. Dinkytown Day Care Center, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In re All Cases Against Sager Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Gargac v. Smith-Rowland Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Randy Williams v. Clark Sand Company, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API