Legal Opinion
M.S. v. Dinkytown Day Care Center, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1992No. 17556PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
M.S. and C.S., guardians ad litem for minor L.R.S., and C.L.P., guardian ad litem for minor K.S.D. (collectively referred to as parents) appeal a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Dinkytown Day Care Center, Inc. (Dinkytown) in their civil action for the alleged sexual abuse of the minor children while in Dinkytown’s care. We affirm.
FACTS
On October 9, 1990, parents filed a summons and complaint against Dinkytown for injuries to the minor children resulting from their alleged sexual abuse while in Dinkytown’s care. Causes of action were raised on behalf of both parents and the children for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Demchuk v. DuplancichIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Theta Properties v. Ronci Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Springer v. BlackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Gomez Ex Rel. Gomez v. Pasadena Health Care Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Oxy USA Inc. v. Quintana Production Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.