Legal Opinion

Loomis v. City of Hailey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. 18321PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this appeal from entry of summary judgment we are required to determine whether the City of Hailey’s particular system of charging an initial sewer and water connection fee of $1,800.00 under a city ordinance violates the Idaho Constitution and applicable portions of the Idaho Revenue Bond Act.

FACTS

In 1969 the voters of the City of Hailey approved a $940,000.00 revenue bond to create a more efficient and more sanitary water and sewer system. Ordinances were adopted to collect user and connection fees and to establish water and sewer system funds to pay for the maintenance,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. YakovacIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ricca v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API