Legal Opinion

Omaechevarria v. Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1918No. 102PublishedCited by 193 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF IDAHO. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

For more than forty years the raising of cattle and sheep have been important industries in Idaho. The stock feeds in part by grazing on the public domain of the United States. This is done with the Government’s acquiescence, without the payment of compensation, and without federal regulation. Buford v. Houtz, 133 U. S. 320, 326. Experience has demonstrated, says the state court, that in arid and semi-arid regions cattle will not graze, nor can they thrive, on ranges where sheep are allowed to graze extensively; that the encroachment of sheep upon ranges previously occupied by cattle results…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Buford v. HoutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API