Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1978No. 14PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that the trial judge erred by admitting into evidence statements made by defendant before he was given the Miranda warnings.

Pursuant to the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of statements made by him to police officers, a voir dire hearing was held before the jury was empaneled. The State offered the testimony of S.B.I. Agent William Thompson and Officers Ronnie Thigpen and James L. Sasser which tended to show that upon receiving information that Don Zell Jones might be involved in the killing of Mrs. Blackwell they ascertained that he was residing at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API