Legal Opinion

State v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1993No. 342A91PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant, Phillip Novell Wiggins, was indicted for first-degree murder, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and as a habitual felon. Defendant was tried capitally to a jury, which returned a verdict of guilty, of first-degree murder based on malice, premeditation and deliberation. Defendant was also found guilty of robbery with a dangerous weapon. The jury found defendant not guilty of first-degree murder under the felony murder rule. After finding that there were no statutory aggravating circumstances to be submitted to the jury, the trial court imposed the mandatory sentence of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API