Legal Opinion

State v. Gould

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1973No. State 6PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

We do not find the difficulty in the wording of see. 940.22, Stats., 1 which Gould does. The legislature created the crime of “aggravated battery” by enactment of ch. 696, sec. 1, Laws of 1955, in the following language, “Whoever intentionally causes great bodily harm to another . . . .” This crime contained three elements: The intention to cause great bodily harm, the causation by some act, and the degree of harm suffered by someone other than the actor. The statute did not embrace the situation involving what is known as a “transferred intent,” where an actor intends to harm A but his acts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gelhaar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. CasselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rabideau v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stuebgen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API