Legal Opinion

Constantine v. Diello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—■ Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a Special Term order which vacated her notice for an eye examination of defendant Diello. Such an examination may be permitted only if it appears that the eye condition is in controversy in the action. (CPLR 3121, subd. [a].) The action is brought to recover damages resulting from the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, which was caused by her collision with a motor vehicle being operated by said defendant along a public highway across which she was walking or running. In a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Harabedian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Maharam v. MaharamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jane L. v. Rodney B.New York City Family Court · 1981
  5. Palma v. HarnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API