Legal Opinion

Jane L. v. Rodney B.

New York City Family Court

Decided May 1, 1981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Nanette Dembitz, J.

On March 2, 1981, near the end of trial in the strenuously contested paternity case at bar, legislation became effective authorizing the admission into evidence in Family Court paternity proceedings of the “Human Leucocyte Antigen” blood tissue test (L 1981, ch 9). Petitioner moves for an order directing respondent to undergo such a test, which in the uniform view of experts is capable of proving respondent’s paternity to a high degree of probability (see below as to reliability of the human leucocyte antigen test, hereafter termed HLA).

*710Prior to the HLA…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra C. v. Thomas J. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Owens v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Interest of JMSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. State on Behalf of Kremin v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Pace v. STATE THROUGH LA. STATE EMP. RET. SYSTEMSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API