Legal Opinion

C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 9, 1955No. C. D. 1733Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

Paragraph 234 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation carrying out the Annecy *135Protocol of Terras of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52476, imposes a duty of 25 per centum ad valorem on limestone suitable for use as monumental or building stone, when “hewn, dressed, or polished, or otherwise manufactured,” and upon-stone of such description when “unmanufactured, or not dressed, hewn, or polished” a duty of 7% cents per cubic foot.

The merchandise at bar consists of limestone suitable for use as monumental or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. National Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Protest 59116-K of J. T. Steeb & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  3. International Granite & Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Bruce Marble & Granite Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API