Legal Opinion

International Granite & Marble Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 15, 1952No. C. D. 1416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

The plaintiffs herein entered at the port of New York certain merchandise described on the invoice as “Rough sawn slabs Rosered Granite.” Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 234 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Finland, T. D. 48554, for—

Granite suitable for use as monumental, paving, or building stone, not specially provided for:

Hewn, dressed, pointed, pitched, lined, or polished, or otherwise manufactured * * *.

By its protest herein the plaintiffs claim the said merchandise to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Protest 59116-K of J. T. Steeb & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Protest 50928-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co.United States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gould Monument Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Bruce Marble & Granite Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API