Legal Opinion

Bruce Marble & Granite Works v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1954No. 58391; protest 161223-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “7 Red Granite Blocks — Rough with two sawn faces on each *363block.” It was assessed with duty at the rate of 30 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 234 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Finland, T. D. 48554, reading as follows:

Granite suitable for use as monumental, paving, or building stone, not specially provided for:

Hewn, dressed, pointed, pitched, lined, or polished, or otherwise manufactured * * *.

The protest claim is for duty at the rate of 12J4…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Protest 59116-K of J. T. Steeb & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  3. International Granite & Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API