Rich v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree in partition of the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo. George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. P. Henshall, and Martin Stevens, for Appellant. J. J. Lermen, Ross & Ross, for Respondent George O. Rich. Daniel A. Ryan, for Respondents Weinke et al. A. Kincaid, for Respondents Hendrickson et al.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action plaintiff’s complaint prayed
for partition of several tracts of land located in the county of San Mateo, which, as the complaint alleged, were owned and held by the plaintiff and the defendant Smith as tenants in common. Defendant M. A. Rich is the wife of the plaintiff, and she and the remaining defendants were made parties to the action under an allegation that they held liens upon the property by virtue of existing mortgages jointly executed by the plaintiff and the defendant Smith upon certain separate parcels of the common property. The plaintiff’s complaint showed further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cheney v. RicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Willmon v. KoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Quick v. BrennerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cummings v. KetchumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Fay v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- De Roulet v. MitchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Parker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Conley v. SharpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Priddel v. ShankieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.