Legal Opinion
Gallo v. Board of Regents of the University of California
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 22, 1995No. Civil 95-1792 J (LSP)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE
JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mara Gallo brings this complaint under federal and state law, alleging discrimination based on her age, sex, and physical disability. Defendants bring a motion to dismiss all claims and to strike certain allegations of her complaint.
I. Motion to Dismiss
Defendants first argue that the discrimination claims are covered by a mandatory arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement. They argue that the failure to arbitrate is a failure to exhaust administrative remedies…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Maldonado-Cordero v. AT & TDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Cable v. Department of Developmental ServicesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
- McBride v. RouthDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Stern v. California State ArchivesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.