Legal Opinion
Cable v. Department of Developmental Services
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 15, 1997No. SA CV 96-1190-GLT[cc]PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
TAYLOR, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Among other things, the court holds (1) exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required before bringing an ADA Title V retaliation claim for objecting to unlawful practices under ADA Title II, and (2) a California public entity’s failure to provide services to disabled persons in the “most integrated setting appropriate” is actionable under ADA Title II.
I. BACKGROUND
It is the stated legislative policy of the State of California to “mainstream” developmentally…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Collins v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Manigaulte v. C.W. Post of Long Island UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Messier v. Southbury Training SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Bogovich v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Rolland v. CellucciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.