Dixie Industrial Co. v. Bank of Wetumpka
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
McCLELLAN, j.
The plaintiff, appellee, declared on three notes, of the respective dates of execution and of maturity stated in the report of the appeal. There was judgment for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, the trial being by the court without jury.
It seems to be accepted by both parties that these notes were evidences of but one indebtedness that, aside from payments, had been enhanced by interest, etc., and were, to the extent of their just obligation, renewals, in order, of such original indebtedness. In addition to the general issue, the defendant (appellant) pleaded payment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Moores v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of PiquaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wolffe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Wheeler v. Home Savings & State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Acme MacHine & Welding Co. v. Home Industry Iron WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Great American Ins. Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Tuskegee Wholesale Grocery Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935