Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1935No. 5 Div. 140Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

On this application, appellant insists that the reason we assigned for holding that the trial court did not err in the first instance in sustaining the objection made by defendant was not properly matter for our consideration because no such ground of objection to the evidence was assigned by defendant on the trial.

When the court overrules an objection to evidence on special grounds assigned, which do not point out a valid objection, this court will not on review consider other grounds which might have been assigned, and which would have pointed out some legal…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Sanders v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Williams v. BoldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API