Legal Opinion

Acme MacHine & Welding Co. v. Home Industry Iron Works

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 1 Div. 614PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was assumpsit for work, labor, and materials furnished per contract. The defense was the general issue and non est factum. The plea of misnomer was stricken, the complaint amended pursuant thereto, and pleas to amended complaint were “no assumpsit” and “material allegations * * * are untrue.” The verdict was for the plaintiff. The order employed in the assignment of errors will be followed.

The secretary and treasurer of plaintiff corporation testified of the agreement for the work and material, that the writing or statement thereof was made by him from the original, and that it was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Councill v. MayhewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bertolla v. KaiserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API