Legal Opinion
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 2010No. A09-1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss, arguing that the district court (1) lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over respondents’ claims because the claims implicate a quasi-judicial decision that is reviewable only by writ of certiorari, and (2) erred by failing to dismiss certain respondents who lack standing. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
On February 3, 2009, appellant Lyon County Board of Commissioners (board) voted to modify the retiree health-insurance benefits for employees of appellant Lyon County (county) who were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. CichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Benda for Common-sense, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. Denise Anderson, Director of Rice ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
- Benda for Common-sense, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. Denise Anderson, Director of Rice ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
- Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026