Legal Opinion

Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Cich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 14, 2010No. A10-354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellants Curtis L. Cich, D.C., and Cich Chiropractic, P.A., challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners (the board). Because we conclude that the district court erred by enjoining Cich from the practice of chiropractic for a period of time beyond the board’s original suspension order, we reverse in part. But because we conclude that the district court properly held that the election by Cich Chiropractic, P.A. to furnish chiropractic services was automatically rescinded 90 days after Cich was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. LINEA LATINA DE ACCIDENTES, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  2. Rohmiller v. HartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API