Legal Opinion

Nichols v. McFarland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1958No. 386PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNs, J.

The appellant asks for a reversal of the judgment or a new trial on the basis of 12 assignments of error. We quote assignment No. 1: “The court erred in permitting the plaintiff to testify as shown by Exceptions Nos. 1 (Rp 11), 2 (Rp 12) and 3 (R p 12).” Assignments Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9 are in similar form.

Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 554, 555, as interpreted in thé decisions of this Court, require: “Always the very error relied upon shall be definitely and clearly presented, and the Court not compelled to go beyond the assignment itself to learn what the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Cecil v. . Lumber CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Porter v. American Cigar Box Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Eastern Steel Products Corporation v. ChestnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API