Nichols v. McFarland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNs, J.
The appellant asks for a reversal of the judgment or a new trial on the basis of 12 assignments of error. We quote assignment No. 1: “The court erred in permitting the plaintiff to testify as shown by Exceptions Nos. 1 (Rp 11), 2 (Rp 12) and 3 (R p 12).” Assignments Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9 are in similar form.
Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 554, 555, as interpreted in thé decisions of this Court, require: “Always the very error relied upon shall be definitely and clearly presented, and the Court not compelled to go beyond the assignment itself to learn what the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cecil v. . Lumber CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Porter v. American Cigar Box Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Eastern Steel Products Corporation v. ChestnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.