Fish v. Redington
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, C. J.:
This action was commenced in the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, in July, 1862, against the defendants, composing the firm of Redington & Co., to restrain them from preparing and offering for sale and selling an article manufactured by them in imitation of an article alleged by the plaintiff to have been invented and composed by him, bearing the name of “Fish’s Infallible Hair Restorative,” and from preparing and offering for sale and selling any article bearing that name; and also to restrain them…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landers v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kuhland v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Caulfield v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Brown v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Sanguinetti v. RossenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Reed v. CalderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Harden v. Atchison & Nebraska R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.