Legal Opinion

Landers v. Bolton

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1864PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint in an action to quiet title, and from the order denying a new trial. The facts found by the Court below are amply sufficient to justify the judgment, and, unless some error appears from the statement to have been committed, which entitles the plaintiff to a new trial on the issues of fact, the judgment must be affirmed.

The plaintiffs claim title in the wife. It was admitted by the parties that on December 6, 1850, title in fee simple to the premises in question was in one Maria B. Gimmy. Plahitiffs proved…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Dutton v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sillyman v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API