Congregation of Ezra Sholom v. Blockbuster, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants Blockbuster, Inc. (“Blockbuster”), John F. An-tioco, Larry Zine, Jackie M. Clegg, Linda Griego, John L. Muething, Viacom, Inc. (“Viacom”), National Amusements, Inc., Richard J. Bressler, Philippe P. Dauman, Michael D. Fricklas, and Sumner M. Red-stone’s motions to dismiss [49 & 50]. Plaintiffs Congregation of Ezra Sholom, et al, also seek leave to file their sur-reply in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss [64]. At bottom, Defendants argue that Class Representative Congregation of Ezra Sholom has failed to state a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pfeffer v. RedstoneSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- In Re Dell Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities, Derivative & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- In Re Arthrocare Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
- Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania v. PetersDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.