Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Stokes

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1981No. Civ. 4699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETTITT, J. *

This case comes to this court on an appeal from an order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and from the judgment entered thereon. The appeal involves the legal effect of respondent Joe J. Correia’s (Correia) preemptory right, set out in a lease, to purchase real property owned by respondent Norene Stokes (Stokes). Stokes was lessor. All parties have agreed appellant’s complaint presented issues of law only, and that a motion for summary judgment was the appropriate vehicle for resolution of the issues involved.

Plaintiff and appellant, Norman Rollins…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Anderson v. Armour & CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Davies MacHinery Co. v. Pine Mountain Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Claremont Terrace Homeowners' Ass'n v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Steffan v. McMillan (In Re Coordinated Financial Planning Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. D'Sa v. Playhut, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Hasty v. Health Service Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API