Legal Opinion

Leech v. Fuller

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

This is a stockholder’s derivative action and the relief sought on this motion is the dismissal of the first and second causes of action with other incidental relief involving the striking out of certain paragraphs of the complaint, and also to *544separately state and number the alleged various transactions in the second cause of action.

The contention that the first cause of action in the amended complaint is insufficient in law is predicated entirely upon a decision of Mr. Justice Collins holding insufficient the third cause of action in the original complaint. Examination of the opinion of Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broderick v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Broderick v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Leech v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Sorin v. SharmoonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Abramson v. BlakeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API