Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Wither, J.
Defendants have moved under rules 90, 102 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order (1) requiring plaintiff to separately state and number what defendants deem to be several causes of action in her complaint, (2) requiring plaintiff to make her complaint more definite and certain, and (3) striking from the complaint certain paragraphs as irrelevant and prejudicial. We shall deal with the several parts of the motion in that order.
Defendants contend that plaintiff has alleged a cause of action (1) against all defendants for diversion of corporate business, (2) against all defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gottfried v. GottfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Payne v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Nasmie Construction Co. v. QuasmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- O'Neil v. KappesserNew York Supreme Court · 1963