Legal Opinion

City of Montebello v. Vasquez

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2016No. S219052PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

The City of Montebello sued three of its former council members and a former city administrator, claiming they violated Government *413Code section 1090 by voting on a waste hauling contract in which they held a financial interest.1 It sought to invalidate the contract and force defendants to disgorge campaign contributions made by the company that was awarded the contract. Defendants moved to strike the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.)2 The trial court denied the motion, and the Court of Appeal affirmed.

We hold, as did the courts below, that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bond v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Rand Resources, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Wilkes & Mchugh, P.A. v. LTC Consulting, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API