Legal Opinion

Ledden v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 28, 2004No. A04-445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

On appeal from the order denying his postconviction petition challenging his 1996 conviction of first — and second-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that (1) the district court that tried him lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and that the statute under which he was convicted is void because it does not contain an enacting clause, and (2) the district court’s failure to respond to his notice and demand should be deemed an admission to its allegations, and that the judge violated her oath of office. Because we find no constitutional deficiency in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Hummel v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Sjoberg v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BoeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. WendorfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API