Legal Opinion

Hummel v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2000No. C1-00-139PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

This case comes before the court on appellant Jimmy Robert Hummel’s appeal from a district court order dismissing his petition for postconviction relief. In his petition, appellant requested a new trial based on allegations of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel in connection with his 1990 first-degree murder conviction. The facts underlying that conviction are set out in State v. Hummel, 483 N.W.2d 68, 70-71 (Minn.1992). The district court dismissed appellant’s petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing, finding appellant’s petition to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. PrtineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Pederson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Boitnott v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API