Hummel v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This case comes before the court on appellant Jimmy Robert Hummel’s appeal from a district court order dismissing his petition for postconviction relief. In his petition, appellant requested a new trial based on allegations of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel in connection with his 1990 first-degree murder conviction. The facts underlying that conviction are set out in State v. Hummel, 483 N.W.2d 68, 70-71 (Minn.1992). The district court dismissed appellant’s petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing, finding appellant’s petition to be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. PrtineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Pederson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Boitnott v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.