Bank of Chewelah v. Carter
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note and to set aside a mortgage which the plaintiff claimed was given in fraud of its rights. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, aud resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to the relief which it sought. Judgment was entered upon the note, with interest, and it was adjudged that the mortgage should be subordinate to the rights of the plaintiff. From this judgment, the defendant Belle Dodge appeals. The other defendant, Henry Carter, did not appeal.
The facts may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Glasgow v. NichollsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- O'Hare v. DuckworthWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilmer v. PlacideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wright v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Gaskill v. AmadonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Walker v. HerkeWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Bond v. WerleyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Yakima First National Bank v. PettiboneWashington Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.