Legal Opinion

O'Hare v. Duckworth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1892No. 502PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Gourt, Mason County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J. —

This was an action by Hugh O’Hare against D. M. Duckworth, sheriff of Mason county, Washington, for damages for taking and detaining certain property which had been levied upon and sold by said sheriff by virtue of a writ of attachment in an action wherein S. J. Holland & Co. were plaintiffs, and one Pat O’Hare, defendant. The property was levied upon as the property of the said Pat O’Hare. Hugh O’Hare claimed to have bought the property of Pat O’Hare prior to the levy, and the defendant claimed that said alleged sale was fraudulent and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridge v. EgglestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  2. Visher v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Sloan v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Woodruff v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Bremerton Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Collins v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Johns v. Arizona Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bank of Chewelah v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Adams v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API