Legal Opinion

Gaskill v. Amadon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1934No. 25099. En BancPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by respondent as the administratrix of her deceased husband, Harry O. Graskill, against the owners and drivers of two cars which had been involved in an automobile collision causing the death of decedent. The negligence alleged against the Barretts, as the owners of a light Ford delivery truck commonly used for the delivery of bakery products, was that they entrusted the driving of the car on the day in question to their son Donald Barrett, who was then a few days less than fourteen years of age; that the brakes were very defective and that they had almost no lining at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Slattery v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Drainage District No. 2 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Davis v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wright v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Healy, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  5. Robison v. SimardWashington Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API