Legal Opinion

Glasgow v. Nicholls

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1923No. 17556PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— James F. Callahan, a resident of Idaho, died in June, 1921. The appellant is the administrator of his estate cum testamento annexo. The respondents Nicholls are husband and wife; the husband, prior to September 21, 1921, conducting a business in the name of Walter J. Nicholls & Company, of which the respondent McBroom is now assignee for the benefit of creditors.

Milholland and Hough, between October 1, 1917, and January 1,1921, were engaged as partners in Spokane in a general bond and security business. They were young men who, prior to the formation of the partnership, had been without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pearce v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Jamieson v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wright v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Gaskill v. AmadonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. American Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Walker v. HerkeWashington Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API