Legal Opinion

In Re Discipline of Swanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1987No. C2-75-46057PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was disbarred in 1976 and seeks reinstatement to the practice of law. A panel of the Lawyers Board of Professional Responsibility recommends that the petition be denied. We agree with the panel’s findings and deny the petition.

Petitioner claims to have undergone such a moral change as to render him fit now again to practice law. He has not sustained the necessary burden of proof.

After petitioner was disbarred in 1976, he petitioned this court for reinstatement. His petition was dated July 16, 1983, 2 years after his probation for the earlier offense had expired. That petition was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Application of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. In re SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. In Re Application of KoenigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RedburnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In Re Petition for Reinstatement of DedefoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API