Legal Opinion

United States v. Mule

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 20, 1930No. 119PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted under the third count of the indictment, which was the only count submitted to the jury. It charged the defendants Mule and Moyer with the statutory offense of concealing illegally imported heroin with knowledge of the illegal importation (21 USCA § 174). Moyer pleaded guilty and testified against Mule. He testified that he bought from Mule and sold to Bonner, an informer, the ounce of heroin which was taken from Bonner by the narcotic agents and put in evidence upon the trial. The first and second counts of the indictment *133charged the defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Toy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Rachmil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. TotDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API