Legal Opinion
United States v. Tot
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 6, 1941No. 197PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, District Judge.
The above entitled cause arises out of the Federal Firearms Act of 19381. An original indictment2 was returned on November 15, 1938. A petition to suppress evidence on the grounds of unconstitutionality of the statute and illegality of the search was filed by the defendant on December 1, 1938, and was denied on August 14, 1939.3
The original indictment was nolle prossed on January 13, 1941.
The present (superseding) indictment was returned on July 13, 1940, correcting errors of transcription in the verbiage of the original indictment. It alleges in substance that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
- United States v. PrescottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.