Legal Opinion
United States v. Schwartz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 17, 1945No. 364PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was indicted with four other defendants but was the only one against whom the case went to trial, a severance having been granted as to the defendant Colonua and three other defendants having pleaded guilty. One of the three, James Stegman, became a witness for the prosecution and testified as to the appellant’s participation in the crimes charged; the other two, Florihdo Isabella and Jack Kaps, did not testify. It was stipulated, however, that Kaps was willing to do so but, if called, would be unable to identify the appellant. Schwartz did not takes the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. On LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Maxie Thomas and Wilbur WigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.