Legal Opinion
United States v. Woods
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 10, 1933No. 448PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 F.2d 262 (1933)
UNITED STATES
v.
WOODS et al.
No. 448.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 10, 1933.
Harold L. Turk, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for Libero Santaniello.
Phillip F. Seigenfeld, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for Mary Woods, Carmine Bruno and Salvatore Gesoalde.
Howard W. Ameli, U. S. Atty., and Herbert H. Kellogg, Emanuel Bublick, and Murray Kreindler, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Brooklyn, N. Y., for the United States.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
CHASE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The appellants press us to reverse because they say the testimony of Mills…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Pettine v. Territory of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Fabian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Clyde L. Schaffer and James H. Devenny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. FarinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- United States v. James Rufus DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.