Legal Opinion
Adams v. Richardson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This action was brought against twenty-three individual defendants and five corporations by the Boston Curb Exchange, a voluntary association, the individual members of which, thirty-six in number, were named. The action is described as an action of tort. Five motions to dismiss were filed by as many groups of the defendants alleging, in substance, that the individual plaintiffs are not entitled to join in one cause of action; that the voluntary association has no capacity to maintain the action; and that the declaration purports to be filed by parties not named as plaintiffs in the writ. A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Spear v. H. V. Greene Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Finance Corp. v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Worthington v. WaringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Paul I. Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Tyler v. Boot & Shoe Workers UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Ullian v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Commissioner of Corp. & Taxation v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.